Within a few decades, machine intelligence will surpass human intelligence, leading to The Singularity — technological change so rapid and profound it represents a rupture in the fabric of human history.
Stock learned off answers are not being rewarded — and rightfully so! Examiners complained that students had pre-prepared answers which they refused to adapt to the question asked. The similarities and differences are unlikely to simply occur to you on the day under exam conditions and the structure of comparing and contrasting, weaving the texts together using linking phrases and illustrating points using key moments is not something you can just DO with no practice.
But you MUST be willing to change, adapt, and select from what you know to engage fully with the question asked.
This compliment, followed by a warning, was included in the report: Use what you know to answer the Q. Anyway, you still want to know what the basic comparative structure IS but remember you do not know what you will write until you see the question.
Even then, your brain should be on fire non-stop as you write your answer. Link individual characters from different texts, establish the ways they or their circumstances are similar but also point out subtle differences. Address the Q, introduce your theme, then your texts — genre, name, author and mention the central character who you will focus on in your discussion of this theme.
Address the Q, introduce the idea of cultural context brieflythen your texts — genre, name, author, plus where and when they are set.
You may want to mention the aspects of cultural context you intend to discuss. Address the Q, briefly introduce what literary genre means, then introduce your texts — genre, name, author.
Outline the aspects of literary genre you will discuss depends on the Q asked. Look at the following examples.
Now look at how this changes for a different mode. Now look at how this changes again: Imagine the Q is: This text explores cultural issues such as social class, ethnic identity and authority figures.
In this text the major authority figure is Susan, the host of the dinner party, who desperately tries to keep her guests in line. Finally look at this literary genre question: NEXT you need to think about structuring the essay itself.
For theme or issue you might plan it out like this but at all times focus on answering the Q: How is this theme introduced? How is this theme developed?
Do the central characters embrace or fight against it? Do other characters influence how this theme unfolds? What view is offered of humanity are the main characters likable or deplorable?The Full Story of Living After Trauma.
This was a long time ago and I am trying my best to be as accurate as possible, but please forgive any inaccuracies. Disclaimer: These essays do not necessarily represent the beliefs of any or all of the staff of the Ontario Consultants on Religious caninariojana.com fact, since we are a multi-faith group, it is quite likely that the beliefs expressed in these essays will differ from at least some of our staff's opinions.
Robotics Matthew T. Mason and Henrik I. Christensen This essay summarizes the current state of robotics, and previews. The Prophet Jeremiah condemned as Pagan the ancient Middle Eastern practice of cutting down trees, bringing them into the home and decorating them. An essay about Daniel Bell’s ‘post-industrial society’, criticisms of his analysis of the role of information and knowledge in relation to contemporary social change and the extent of these changes.
Includes discussion of post industrial society, post industrialism, social structure, theoretical knowledge, deindustrialisation, technological determinism and the information society.
Hi Simon, Your essay is brilliant. I just wonder how you can have many excellent ideas. I am struggling to answer these questions for long time.