Some of the most intelligent and ambitious individuals, who are unsatisfied with their own countries, bring their skills to America. It increases the diversity and expands the culture of the country. Decreasing or eliminating legal immigration will inevitably create more incentive to come to the country illegally, which leads to less assimilation and fewer taxpaying, law-abiding citizens. It improves the overall image of America internationally, as it is seen as an open, welcoming country; and immigrants who return home or maintain contact with family back home have a true image of America, not the one propagandized in much of the international media.
Home Environment 14 Central Pros and Cons of Smoking Bans 14 Central Pros and Cons of Smoking Bans Environment Aug 30, Smoking ban policies are implemented in some American states and cities but the contentions on whether they are necessary and relevant are still heard from supporters and critics.
Restrictions on cigarette smoking can be traced back as early the 16th century and up to now, this issue remains to be controversial. Smoking ban is a policy that prohibits smoking in public places like restaurants, workplaces, parks, malls, government offices and schools, among others.
There are policies implemented statewide and there are some that only restrict smoking in public places but not in enclosed areas. To get an idea on how people are taking smoking bans, here are some of the views expressed by proponents and opponents.
List of Pros of Smoking Bans 1. They reduce the risk of second-hand smoke. Advocates for smoking bans claim that passing a law to prohibit smoking in public places can lessen the possibility of second-hand smoke being inhaled by non-smokers.
Second-hand smoke, according to experts, can lead to increased risk to emphysema, cardiovascular disorders and respiratory problems. By restricting the places where smoking is allowed, this can be prevented. They lessen air pollution.
Supporters also say that states and cities which have non-smoking policies and prohibited smoking in restaurants and public indoor spaces have better indoor air quality as opposed to cities which still allow smoking public. They improve work productivity. Proponents point out that not all people smoke at the office.
If smoking is allowed, non-smokers can still inhale the smoke and it can be bothersome for them to smell the smoke. On the other hand, if it is prohibited, employees can be more productive. They also added that smoking can cause respiratory infections and smokers are prone to these. If employees smoke less, chances are, the risk of getting sick is minimized.
They reduce healthcare costs. Advocates maintain their position about the benefits of smoking bans by saying that reports indicate reduced health costs in cities were smoking are restricted. And since health care costs take around 9.
They decrease the possibility of fires. Smoking can increase the risks of fire in places with highly flammable materials. There have been instances of fires which started from lit cigarettes. Moreover, accidents related to explosions at work sites can also happen if smoking will not be prohibited.
Cigarette butts are non-biodegradable and can clog water systems if thrown recklessly. With banning smoking in public places, there will be lesser cigarette butts and lesser toxic garbage that can be stuck in water systems. They contribute to lower energy consumption and personal expenses. If smoking is banned in public places such as malls and restaurants, there will be lesser need to use ventilation and this can result to lesser energy consumption and in effect, lesser expense.
With smoking bans, it can reduce the expense for cigarette purchase of a smoker in half. They result to cleaner areas where food is prepared and manufactured. With restricting smoking, supporters posit that this can ensure cleanliness is observed in food preparation in restaurants and in the streets.
Moreover, smoking bans in workplaces and pharmaceuticals also contribute to cleaner indoor quality as well as maintaining cleanliness. They lessen the chance of influencing others to take on the habit. Supporters for smoking bans claim that cigarette smoking is also considered a status symbol and some teenagers can be influenced to smoke just to fit it.
If these young people will be exposed to smoking less, they will not be easily tempted to try. List of Cons of Smoking Bans 1.Should More Gun Control Laws Be Enacted in the United States? Read pros, cons, and expert responses in the debate.
U NDERSTAND T HE I SSUES.
Should More Gun Control Laws Be Enacted in the United States? Pro & Con Quotes; AMA policy supports stricter enforcement of present federal and state gun safety legislation, and the imposition of.
8 Remarkable Pros and Cons of a Traditional Economy.
Home Policy 5 Serious Pros and Cons of Immigration Reform. 5 Serious Pros and Cons of Immigration Reform. Policy; It was a move that would see “up to million children and young adults who are in the United States illegally” benefit from such a policy.
In , he announced new. Of course, there is a distinction between eliminating and extending term limits, but the difference has been less perceptible during the last decade. The longer a chief executive holds power, the more the delineation between the state and the ruling party becomes blurred.
Redistricting-Redistricting is the process of drawing United States electoral district boundaries, often in response to population changes determined by the results of the decennial census. Packing-to concentrate as many voters of one type into a single electoral district to reduce their influence in other districts.
The Trans-Pacific Partnership was negotiated between the United States and 11 other countries. All of the countries border the Pacific. All of the countries border the Pacific.
They were Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam. May 06, · The Pros And Cons Of Globalization. and provide funding to their state owned companies that dump their products in America.
They also steal our technologies, sell counterfeit versions of our.